民法 civil law◇民法典 civil code; 民法法典 the body of civil law; [拉丁语] corpus juris civilis; 民法规范 norm of the civil law; 民法通则 general rule of the civil law; 民法效力 validity of civil law
韩国教育法体系的全面修订 towards the 21th century: revision of system of educational law in south korea
建立我国会计理论研究方法体系的探讨 an approach to establishing the research method system of china's accounting theories
The function of trust protection in the system of civil laws 信赖保护原则在民法体系中的作用
This part is the foundation upholstery of the article . the second part endeavors to seek the existential rationality in the civil law system , 第二部分通过分析债权的相对性和不可侵性及其二者的关系,来寻求第三人侵害债权制度在民法体系中存在的合理性。
In order to limit the sellers " behavior , in the present - day civil law system , warranty against defects of title still exists and exerts for maintaining business safety and protecting the consumers " right 为了特别规制出卖人的行为,在现代民法体系中,仍应坚持瑕疵担保责任这一古老的制度,以发挥其在维护交易安全和保护消费者利益方面独特的价值和作用。
In consideration of three aspects of value , logic and fact , with the application of comparative method , hermeneutics of civil law , law of economic analysis and the method of systematization of civil law in compatibility with logic and value , the author attempts to make a rather systematic and profound discussion on the system of public conviction dependent on the registration of real estate , including the definition of the effect of public conviction dependent on the registration of real estate , the construction of concrete institutions , the pursuit about value , the effect of systematization and the reflection on legislation 不动产登记具有公信力作为第三人保护的基本规则,是物权法公示公信原则的重要内容,已被我国学者所肯认。笔者从价值、逻辑和事实三个层面,尝试运用比较方法、民法解释学、经济分析法学、兼容逻辑和价值的民法体系化方法对不动产登记公信力制度进行较为系统深入的探讨。本文共分为五个部分。
Chapter 1 carries on the limits to the textual treatise scope what this text mainly discusses is the ownership inthe chinese ancient times and private farmland to change . and from the consideration of the thesis system integrity , we also differentiate and analyze the essence of the deposited farmland in this chapter 关于中国古代是否存在完整的民法体系,学术界一直存在着争议。其实,在中国几千年的历史进程中,民间的民事行为一直广泛、有序地进行着。抛开“体系”这个范畴,我们无法否认这其中必然有着某些规则一直在发挥着作用。
However , the relevant questions are full of challenge . in the world scope , the negotiable instrument consideration is seldom provided in the negotiable instrument laws of the countries in the genevese uniform negotiable instrument law system , which is not meant that the negotiable instrument consideration is nothing important . it has both theoretic and practical meanings 我国法律体系系属大陆法系,在民法体系中没有规定对价制度,我国票据法总体上也是采纳日内瓦统票法系的立法思路,但是在第10条第2款规定: “票据的取得,必须给付对价” ,首次将对价这个概念引入我国的基本法律之中。
However , due to differences in the thinking style of the two law systems , the history background , the culture tradition , and so on , the trusts system which has strong common law trait is not in harmony with the traditional civil law system , and conflicts with the former law in a certain extent 但由于法系思维、历史背景以及文化传统等方面存在诸多不同,带有浓厚英美法色彩的信托制度并不能很好地融入大陆法系固有的民法体系,并在一定程度上冲击着原有的法律制度。