basing on the multiple comprehension of the processive learning assessment, we designed, implemented and verified an action project 基于对过程性学习评价的多维理解,我们设计、实施并检验了行动方案。
the processive learning assessment can be understood from five dimensionality : the value tropism of assessment, the time of assessment, the space of assessment, the content of assessment and the method of assessment 过程性学习评价可以从五个维度来理解:评价的价值取向、评价发生的时间、评价发生的空间、评价指向的内容以及评价使用的方法。
through the study we find : the processive learning assessment is especially useful in leading and facilitating students to grasp learning method; it is reliable to use rubric, which should be design according to specific learning content, to carry through the processive learning assessment on the whole; the processive learning assessment including the assessing content such as knowledge and skill, process and method, sensibility, attitude and view of value, adapts to use self-assessment relatively; in order to assure the reliability of assessing each other, we should keep the learning teams consistent with the assessing teams; teachers are not proper to assess their students " sensibility, attitude and view of value which is internal; research on the design of learning journal should be reinforced, and we should decide whether to adopt it according to the degree of mature of the students and the characteristic of assessing content; it is capable for teachers to make qualitative assessment on student's learning process; parents assessment does n't adapt to use qualitative method completely; the improper work-dividing of assessors and the occasion of assessment will influence the operation of assessment; when deciding to explain and utilize the assessing result, we should differentiate two kinds of the processive learning assessment strictly 研究发现:过程性学习评价对于导向与促进学生掌握学习方法特别有用;使用评价量表进行过程性学习评价基本可靠,其设计要以每个具体的学习内容为依据;包括知识技能、过程方法、情感态度价值观等评价内容的过程性学习评价比较适合采取自评;为了保证互评的可靠性,要保持学习小组与评价小组的一致;教师不适宜评价学生的情感态度价值观这一类内在的内容;学习日志的研究设计有待加强,并且要根据学生的成熟程度和评价内容的特点决定是否采用;教师对学生的学习过程给予质性评语基本可行;家长评价不适宜采取完全质性的评语方式;评价主体的分工以及评价的时机都会对评价的可操作性产生影响;在决定评价结果的解释与利用时要严格区分两种类型的过程性学习评价。
through the study we find : the processive learning assessment is especially useful in leading and facilitating students to grasp learning method; it is reliable to use rubric, which should be design according to specific learning content, to carry through the processive learning assessment on the whole; the processive learning assessment including the assessing content such as knowledge and skill, process and method, sensibility, attitude and view of value, adapts to use self-assessment relatively; in order to assure the reliability of assessing each other, we should keep the learning teams consistent with the assessing teams; teachers are not proper to assess their students " sensibility, attitude and view of value which is internal; research on the design of learning journal should be reinforced, and we should decide whether to adopt it according to the degree of mature of the students and the characteristic of assessing content; it is capable for teachers to make qualitative assessment on student's learning process; parents assessment does n't adapt to use qualitative method completely; the improper work-dividing of assessors and the occasion of assessment will influence the operation of assessment; when deciding to explain and utilize the assessing result, we should differentiate two kinds of the processive learning assessment strictly 研究发现:过程性学习评价对于导向与促进学生掌握学习方法特别有用;使用评价量表进行过程性学习评价基本可靠,其设计要以每个具体的学习内容为依据;包括知识技能、过程方法、情感态度价值观等评价内容的过程性学习评价比较适合采取自评;为了保证互评的可靠性,要保持学习小组与评价小组的一致;教师不适宜评价学生的情感态度价值观这一类内在的内容;学习日志的研究设计有待加强,并且要根据学生的成熟程度和评价内容的特点决定是否采用;教师对学生的学习过程给予质性评语基本可行;家长评价不适宜采取完全质性的评语方式;评价主体的分工以及评价的时机都会对评价的可操作性产生影响;在决定评价结果的解释与利用时要严格区分两种类型的过程性学习评价。
through the study we find : the processive learning assessment is especially useful in leading and facilitating students to grasp learning method; it is reliable to use rubric, which should be design according to specific learning content, to carry through the processive learning assessment on the whole; the processive learning assessment including the assessing content such as knowledge and skill, process and method, sensibility, attitude and view of value, adapts to use self-assessment relatively; in order to assure the reliability of assessing each other, we should keep the learning teams consistent with the assessing teams; teachers are not proper to assess their students " sensibility, attitude and view of value which is internal; research on the design of learning journal should be reinforced, and we should decide whether to adopt it according to the degree of mature of the students and the characteristic of assessing content; it is capable for teachers to make qualitative assessment on student's learning process; parents assessment does n't adapt to use qualitative method completely; the improper work-dividing of assessors and the occasion of assessment will influence the operation of assessment; when deciding to explain and utilize the assessing result, we should differentiate two kinds of the processive learning assessment strictly 研究发现:过程性学习评价对于导向与促进学生掌握学习方法特别有用;使用评价量表进行过程性学习评价基本可靠,其设计要以每个具体的学习内容为依据;包括知识技能、过程方法、情感态度价值观等评价内容的过程性学习评价比较适合采取自评;为了保证互评的可靠性,要保持学习小组与评价小组的一致;教师不适宜评价学生的情感态度价值观这一类内在的内容;学习日志的研究设计有待加强,并且要根据学生的成熟程度和评价内容的特点决定是否采用;教师对学生的学习过程给予质性评语基本可行;家长评价不适宜采取完全质性的评语方式;评价主体的分工以及评价的时机都会对评价的可操作性产生影响;在决定评价结果的解释与利用时要严格区分两种类型的过程性学习评价。
processiveとは意味:{形} : 前進{ぜんしん}する processive перевод:1) _книж. поступательный; развивающийся Ex: processive quality of language тенденция языка к развитию