pseudogapping造句
例句与造句
- Pseudogapping is more restricted in distribution than VP-ellipsis.
- If it does not, the attempt at pseudogapping fails, e . g.
- These attempts at pseudogapping fail because the remnant does not stand in contrast to the parallel expression in the antecedent clause.
- This aspect of pseudogapping is unlike VP-ellipsis, which can operate both forwards and backwards, e . g.
- One can note that the second of the two examples is an instance of pseudogapping, pseudogapping being a particular manifestation of VP-ellipsis.
- It's difficult to find pseudogapping in a sentence. 用pseudogapping造句挺难的
- One can note that the second of the two examples is an instance of pseudogapping, pseudogapping being a particular manifestation of VP-ellipsis.
- Answer ellipsis is like sluicing in this regard, but unlike gapping, stripping, VP-ellipsis, and pseudogapping, e . g.
- Thus if the catena is taken as the fundamental unit of syntactic analysis, the analysis of pseudogapping can remain entirely with what is present on the surface.
- The examples so far illustrate that pseudogapping is like gapping insofar as the remnants of both ellipsis mechanisms must stand in contrast to the parallel expressions in the antecedent clauses.
- Another noteworthy trait of pseudogapping ( and one that supports the view that it is a type of VP-ellipsis ) is that it absent from languages related to English.
- Another aspect that aligns pseudogapping with gapping is that it must operate forwards; it cannot operate backwards, that is, the gap must follow its filler ( = antecedent ).
- :: She does not want to date him more than * he does not want to date her . "'- Pseudogapping fails to include the negation in the ellipsis "'
- Assuming movement first and ellipsis second in this manner, a constituent-based analysis of pseudogapping ( and other ellipsis mechanisms ) is possible, since the elided material can be viewed as a constituent after all.
- As with the remnants of gapping, the remnant of pseudogapping must stand in contrast to the parallel expression in the antecedent clause, e . g . " water " must stand in contrast to " milk " in the first example.